KUIAVETS
Friction Check

A guided review of one real case through the eight KUIAVETS steps, from clarifying the outcome to deciding what should be sustained and scaled.

Friction Check

Choose one situation in which work, a decision, or a change has stalled. Eight connected questions will take you from the intended outcome to a safe first experiment and the evidence needed to judge it.

Answer for one specific case and use facts rather than a general impression. Each question builds on the previous answer, so complete the steps in order.

The result is a structured case map and a hypothesis to test, not a definitive diagnosis.

STEP 1

SET THE CONTEXT

Please specify your role and select the system you want to analyze to narrow down the results.

K Know the Outcome

What outcome are you seeking, who does it matter to, and what would show success?

U Understand Reality

What actually happened? Name the facts, decisions, and events before explaining why.

I Investigate Friction

Where did work or decisions lose momentum, and what mechanism caused it?

A Analyze Adaptation

How did people adapt to this system, which workarounds emerged, and what do they protect?

V Validate Friction Value

Which friction protects quality, safety, or accountability, and which only obstructs the outcome?

E Experiment with Change

What small, safe system change is worth testing first?

T Track Evidence

What evidence would show that the change works, and which side effects must be tracked?

S Scale & Sustain Change

What should be embedded and scaled if the evidence confirms the result?

CONCLUSION

YOUR REPORT IS ALMOST READY!

The diagnostic has been successfully completed. Enter your name and email address so we can instantly generate a visualization of your system's profile and give you access to personalized recommendations.

SYSTEM PROFILE

YOUR KUIAVETS CASE MAP

This visualization shows exactly where your system is losing energy. Review the critical areas below and discuss the results with an expert to develop a plan for targeted changes.

Friction Check

Identified Patterns of Organizational Friction

The analysis revealed the lowest scores in the Infrastructure and Adaptive Capacity areas, indicating significant gaps between work phases and a difficulty in responding to change. Although the basic processes are in place, complex interdependencies continue to consume too many of the team’s resources, and new experiments often fail to take root or merely add an additional burden on top of existing tasks. To prevent the organization from stalling, the first step is to synchronize feedback loops and eliminate manual coordination at the interfaces between departments, transforming fragmented actions into a single, coherent workflow.